|
Supplemental Needs Trusts
What is a supplemental needs trust?
A supplemental needs trust is a type of spendthrift trust that
allows a Trustee with the assistance of a Trust Advisory Committee
to make funds available to a disabled person to supplement the benefits
that the government is required to provide to disabled individuals
who are poor. The government provides funds that are used to pay
for basic needs such as food, clothing, and shelter. The Trust
funds go to pay for things that improve a disabled person's quality
of life such as extra and supplemental:
- medical care;
- health and nursing care;
- dental care;
- developmental services;
- support and maintenance;
- education;
- rehabilitation;
- therapies;
- medical devices;
- recreation;
- social opportunities;
- assistive devices;
- advocacy;
- legal services;
- personal attendant care; and
- consultant services
over and above the benefits the person otherwise receives as a result of his
or her disabilities from any local, state, or federal government or from any
other private or public profit or nonprofit organizations.
The Trustee is responsible for making the payments for the benefit of the disabled
person. In most cases, the Trustee decides how to spend the trust funds based
on advice received from a Trust Advisory Committee. This committee usually
includes a family member, a person knowledgeable about the requirements of people
with special needs, and a third member with special interest or knowledge about
the disabled person.
Who needs a supplemental needs trust?
Persons who are severely disabled and unable to support themselves probably
would benefit from a supplemental needs trust.
Why should a person who is severely disabled have a supplemental needs trust?
Supplemental needs trusts are set for two primary reasons:
- to preserve the disabled person's eligibility for governmental benefits;
and
- to efficiently and economically manage the financial affairs of
a person who is disabled.
A severely disabled person could be eligible for local, state and federal benefits
such as SSI and Medicaid. To be eligible for those benefits, the person is
limited in the amount of liquid resources "available" to him or her.
This amount varies from state to state but is generally around $2000. Assets
held in a guardianship or conservatorship account are considered "available"
to the disabled person for purposes of benefit eligibility determinations and
would disqualify the person from receipt of the benefits. Assets held in a
properly drafted Trust are not considered "available" to the beneficiary,
as title to the assets does not transfer to the beneficiary. The Social Security
Administration recognizes and acknowledges this difference.
Eligibility for the two basic Social Security benefits is important for far
more than just the monthly income stream provided by SSI. The federal Medicaid
budget allocations go to each state to provide ongoing and long-term care for
a great number of persons with a wide variety of disabilities. The federal Medicaid
budget does not limit expenditures to traditional medical areas. Often included
are such things as long-term care and rehabilitation, group home or other living
arrangements, sheltered workshops or work activity rehabilitation, and provision
for other direct client-centered needs. By maintaining eligibility for SSI
and Medicaid, an entire system of state services for social programs, residential
alternatives, rehabilitation, and case management is preserved. Most state programs
adopt the SSI and Medicaid eligibility criteria for entrance into those programs.
The use of a trust as a financial, investment, and management vehicle is often
far more economical and financially advantageous than a guardianship or conservatorship.
Ongoing reports to the court are minimized, investment opportunities expanded,
and court and attorneys' fees reduced. The trade-off in cost and investment
flexibility does not sacrifice security for the beneficiary. The traditional
duties of a fiduciary of investment management and disbursements for the beneficiary
are split between a corporate fiduciary and a three or four person Trust Advisory
Committee comprised of family members and appropriate providers or consultants.
The use of a corporate fiduciary as a Trustee responsible solely for financial
investment, and a Trust Advisory Committee with responsibility for directing
expenditures, creates an internal check and balance system far more responsive
than the court review process. In addition, an internal case management team
is created by combining a concerned, informed Trust Advisory Committee to direct
spending with the financial abilities of a professional Trustee fully subject
to the provisions of the state Trust Act and the "prudent person"
investment approach.
When can a supplemental needs trust be set up?
There are two principle times when settlement trusts are set up.
Family members of a disabled person may set up a trust as part of the family
estate plan. The family wants to help the disabled person by making money available,
but it doesn't want to deprive the person of the government resources that are
available to help such individuals. If money is given to the person outright,
the person is disqualified from government benefits until all the inherited
money has been used up. Setting up a supplemental needs trust allows the family
to supplement the government benefits with family resources.
When a disabled person receives a personal injury settlement to
compensate this person for the injury that caused the disability,
this person's attorney or the Court may set up a trust. Concern
is sometimes expressed about preservation of government benefit
eligibility in light of the receipt of substantial settlement sums.
However, unless a disabled individual has been fully and completely
compensated with no risk that future medical and ongoing
living needs will exceed the underlying settlement, the preservation
of potential future government benefits is critical. Furthermore,
because of the way the social service delivery system has developed
in many states, an individual cannot privately purchase into the
same social service systems that could be obtained free through
benefit qualification. Many states seek to maintain control over
the possible placements in facilities and programs such as group
homes, workshops, and vocational rehabilitation services. The only
way to maintain control over those facilities and programs is to
restrict the clients who can be placed in them. State agencies
want to ensure that their clients have a priority for the services.
Accordingly, there is often a provision in the state contracts with
those facilities and programs that can punish the service providers
if they take private paying clients. An injured person could be
in the anomalous position of having assets as a result of the settlement,
but not being able to use those assets to obtain the services needed
to develop the person's remaining capabilities. Thus, the settlement,
while it would provide some privately paid services at a very high
cost, would preclude this person from receiving the most highly
skilled public service benefits available because of the penalties
those service providers would have to pay to the state.
|